Friday, September 28, 2012

My Top Fives

 Books



































Food


My mother's apple cake
photo courtesy of Katharine Romanow from Jewish Women's Archive 





NY or Montreal bagel with cream cheese and lox
photo from Wynona Street

Schwaggy Chinese Food

Good Chinese Food



















Coffee


Shows









Places

New York, NY
My own picture


Tofino, BC






Toronto, ON
































Temagami, ON
My own picture


Western Galilee, Israel
Picture from Israel In An Instant


Movies














Got any top fives of your own?


p.s. This post was such a pain in the ass to put together and looks so amateur that it motivated me to finally get my new site going! Details very soon.

***

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

MOE contributes to Child education development in Singapore

Pre schools, kindergarten and nursery schools are aiming for new heights today. The Child development program and orientation process has been discovering new ways to train the best. To what extent these efforts are effective and innovative? Can we add more value to their upcoming projects? How relevant these initiatives are for their great endeavour?


Before coming to the criticism part let us have a quick look on the Kindergarten and Primary education facilities of Singapore. Ministry of Education (MOE) primarily controls the development and monitoring activities for state schools and private schools. There are differences on autonomy, funding, course curriculum, tuition fees and admission procedure between these two level of schools. Voluntary Welfare Organizations (VWO) partially funded by MOE run Special education (SPED) schools for children with disabilities. For Singapore citizens expenditure in education sector comprises of 20% of annual national budget. This serves state education and government aided private sectors. For homeschooling also exemptions are allowed. English being the primary language for children which is being taught from pre school stage.


Kindergartens provide 3 years education to children aged between three and six. These are termed as Nursery, Kindergarten 1 and Kindergarten 2. There are more than 200 kindergartens registered with MOE. These are run by private sector, community foundations and business groups etc. Primary education is divided into two stages Foundation and Orientation. Foundation stage is a four year programme (Primary 1 to Primary 4) and Orientation stage is for two year (Primary 5 to Primary 6). Primary education is compulsory and tuition fees in Singapore are free of cost up to this level. But monthly SGD 13 is being charged as miscellaneous costs.
At the end of Primary 6, National Primary Schools leaving Exam is being held to determine whether the student is good enough to leave primary school and apply for secondary education.


Home tuition Singapore is considered as an additional help for the parents seeking to improve their children's grade and attain complete private assistance. Education policies are favouring meritocracy, the ideology to identify and nurture young students for leadership positions. Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS) programme provides financial help to low income families having household income less than SGD 1500 or SGD 1800. Even every year Edusave Merit Bursary (EMB) is provided to about 40,000 students born in poor families. Ministry of education conduct exchange programmes with 120 primary and secondary schools in Singapore. Through this students get chance to visit overseas schools in ASEAN countries like China, India etc.

Author's Bio:
Krishna Swaminathan an eminent mandarin tutor in Singapore shares his expert views on Singapore education beneficiaries. Find more information from MyprivateTutor.sg an online tuition agency in Singapore.

by Krishna Swaminathan

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Best Public School for child education in Rohtak

Indus Public School is located in Rohtak. The mission of the school is to offer quality education to the students, the aims are to realizing the full potential - physical, emotional, intellectual and spiritual growth of each child. The school aims to present the world to our children, so in turn, they can present themselves to the world. The school has a futuristic approach towards education in accordance with the changing social needs of the new millennium. The school aims to preserve and enhance the highest standard of excellence and prepare the generation for the 21st century.

The school is spread over a vast lush green campus on National Highway - 10. The school is located at 30 minutes drive from Delhi Border. The school is affiliated to the Central Board of Secondary Education. The school is up to XII level and provides education in Medical, Non-Medical and Commerce Streams. The aim of the school is to provide an environment in which the child becomes physically fit, socially adaptable emotionally balanced, intellectually alert and spiritually enlightened while allowing the hidden potential in each individual to blossom. The school aims to train and prepare the students to manage stress of modern life and having a scientific and rational outlook. The school aims to provide the best in education. The school aims to foster noble virtues like affection respect, obedience, forgiveness, gratitude, helpfulness, service and exemplary behavior.

The school follows a House System. There are four houses in the school. These four houses are Beas, Jhelum, Ravi and Satluj. Each house here is headed by a House captain (Boy or Girl) and by House prefects. A member of the staff is assisted by several other teachers (tutor). The school organizes Inter House competitions in games and sports, dramatics, debates, quiz, arts and music. The school has Interactive Smart Classes in its school. Interactive SmartClass is a revolutionary, teaching-learning system that comes from India�s largest and most respected education company, Educomp Solutions. There are about 3000 progressive schools in the country that are SmartClass Empowered. With Smart Class, the teachers are able to complement their traditional methods of teaching on almost all school subjects with well-researched, mapped-to-curriculum digital lessons (animation, graphics, audio and video) on an everyday basis during the teaching periods. Students are encouraged to take part in scholastic activities.

Co-curricular activities are �The Third Dimension of Education�. This helps in developing skills. Students are required to take part in atleast one activity per year for which they are assessed. The school has a very good infrastructure and a very caring and loving staff.

by Arvind Kashyap

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Appreciating Your Childs Educational Toy

We live in extremely busy times. With expenses rising and the need to provide a good life for our children, most households rely on incomes from both parents, instead of just one, leaving the child with less than enough time to bond with his or her mom or dad.

Because of this, most parents try to make it up to their kids by purchasing toys that seek to compensate for the absence of prolonged sit-down times.

Thus, the demand for children's educational toys has grown. What educational toys do is fill the gap that has been created by the lack of time parents have for their kids.

In the past, both or either one of the parents had the time to help their kids with homework or read them dozens of stories. However, nowadays, this has become close to impossible because every has to make a living.

While children's educational toys do not aim to replace the actual presence of a parent, it is able to temporarily fill a void. It is for this reason that toy manufacturers have taken great pains and conducted deep research into a child's learning levels and capacities in order to come up with an educational toy that would be a fount of knowledge.

Examples of children's educational toys include Vtech's portable laptop computers that teach kids spelling, math basics, geography and carry games that test and enhance analytical skills and logic. Toys "R" Us has also joined the bandwagon and come up with its own line of educational toys, while LeapFrog has started to make waves.

The good thing about these educational toys for children is that they tickle the interest not just of children, but also of adults. Sales of children's educational toys have risen continuously over the past years because more and more people are starting to see their value, especially as gifts, as opposed to simply giving a stuffed toy or a doll. Children will be able to appreciate a toy more if they are able to interact with it more actively.

Educational toys carry a relatively hefty price tag, though, but consumers do not seem to mind because of the huge benefits these kinds of toys bring for the kids. Every age level has a corresponding kind of educational toy that is suitable to his or her abilities, so no child will be left wanting. The thought that educational toys are boring and not fun at all has been circumvented by the creative toy makers of present.

by Low Jeremy

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Unfollow: Social Media and the Sliding Scale of Friendship


As seen on Five Star FridaySyndicated on BlogHer.com
Social media is supposed to be all about connections. So what happens when those connections fray?

Most of my online connections started organically enough – the first people I ‘friended’ on Facebook were real-life friends, relatives and online friends whose relationships had been cultivated during years of getting to know each other through our blogs.

Next came the coworkers, the old high-school and university buddies, the long-lost roommates we spent hours discovering in the wormhole that is another person’s friends list.

And then came twitter, where my collection inflated; our personal boundaries for claiming knowledge of one another expanding exponentially to anybody that engaged online; anybody that followed me first; anybody that wanted in.

Sometimes, I would (and still do) get a scary, first-day-of-school kind of feeling about interactions on social media. Do I know you well enough to friend request you? Should I follow or are we not there yet? Are your rules the same as mine? Am I overstepping or do I just not see the welcome mat laid at my feet?

Eventually I began to impose arbitrary systems for keeping track of my social media connections: if LinkedIn was my Rolodex, Facebook would be my address book and Twitter would be my catchall. I would engage with the appropriate level of privacy vs. information sharing, deciding who would be interested in, and with whom I would feel most comfortable, sharing personal photos; whom would benefit most from my off-the-cuff witticisms; whom would most appreciate carefully vetted news items and of course, with whom I could most expertly and benevolently share my professional work and build my profile as a writer.

But this is a system that is difficult to sustain. If Twitter is supposed to be a place where literally anybody can talk with anybody else, at what point do I move somebody out of the, ‘we have knowledge of each other online’ category to the, ‘Following’ category? If I met you at a conference and we shared a laugh, am I obligated to follow you on Twitter? If you follow me on Twitter, am I obligated to accept your Facebook friend request? If there is no way in hell our businesses will ever overlap and I don’t even really like you very much, must we exchange LinkedIn profiles?

Sometimes, when this all gets to be too much, I demote people. Well, that’s harsh. What I do is semi-regularly happen upon somebody in a friend list somewhere that I realize either a) I haven’t interacted with in a long, long time b) has consistently been bringing me down with their online shenanigans c) has truly done something to piss me off or d) unfollowed me though I didn’t realize it and so I return the favour.

It all becomes very petty, actually, a game I tire easily of playing. I start to think about opening the boundaries altogether, removing all semblance of personal information from social media and just letting everybody in everywhere. Or I start to think about stopping altogether. Shutting it down, privatizing, getting off, getting out. Both are liberating, scary ideas for a person living so much of her life online.

A meaningful interaction, a wonderful shared post or a tweet from somebody I had been missing usually brings me back around and out of the throes of any virtual existential crisis I may be edging toward. I manage my time online in a more productive way, and appreciate the people in my online space more, at least for a while.

And then, this week, two things:

First, a real life friendship took a total nosedive. For the sake of not airing dirty laundry, I will assume my culpability in this, but regardless of who was right or wrong, the friendship is certainly strained. Fractured. Tense and tenuous and not something I feel like I can put any more energy into at the moment.

So why is this person still sending me messages on Facebook? Why is this person still tweeting me?

If the basis of all of our online interactions stem from the fact that we have had a real life relationship, and that relationship is now – at least to me – fragmented, how is it at all possible to compartmentalize our friendship so intentionally, so perfectly, that we will no longer spend time on our real life relationship but can continue to interact online?

Next, somebody I know decently well intentionally blocked me on Twitter. Being blocked, I had assumed, was a mistaken flick of a wrist, so I candidly, and with no malice, inquired as to why I was being treated as tweeter non grata.

As it turns out, the person that had blocked me was going through a virtual existential crisis of their own. For survival or therapy, this person had culled their very small list of followers to an even smaller list, consisting only of people that this Tweeter felt had not crossed the lines that they were now imposing on their followers. 

This person had halved their small followers list, and I had landed on the chopping block, despite having never crossed any of the lines that had been laid out. They had jumped the gun. I was invited back. Unblocked.

But the damage, to my ego and to our friendship, was done. This person’s instinct was to lump me in with the expendables. The unwanteds.

This person was an old-school blogging friend to me, somebody that had accepted my hospitality and whose family had shared dinner at my family's table.

Yes, I was hurt.

I refused the offer to become a follower again. I removed this person from my Facebook profile, because, in my order of things, if you do not want me on Twitter, the most impersonal, most inclusive of social media, than I certainly do not want you on Facebook, where you are privy to my more personal interactions.

In both of these instances I am trying to reconcile the order in which I prioritize relationships with the order in which they prioritize theirs.

I am trying, but failing, to find a place where the real life connection is so easily discounted and the online becomes a place to ignore, bolster or dissolve the real.

I can’t do it. And I am totally flummoxed that it is happening. Perhaps we simply deal with conflict in different ways. Perhaps conflict has become a more complicated, layered thing in the world of social media 2.0.

In both of these instances, the real life portion of the connection seems to be the disposable thing, the part that was not cherished or cultivated, the energy siphoned from the real to the virtual, where, it seems, fences are broken and mended at the click of a mouse.

I can’t do it. As much as I am a creature of the internal, safe, glowing screen, I am more a creature of the light. I need to know where I stand with people and get confused by passive-aggressive actions.

Sometimes, it’s easy. Sometimes we exchange virtual business cards or a laugh at a conference and then enjoy the simple space we take up in each other’s online life.

And sometimes the lines become more blurred; our relationships become harder to contain, harder to compartmentalize. We begin to see people simply as chattel, as numbers, as lists, to be contracted or expanded according to whim or want.

I just cannot allow myself to remain on someone’s list when my place in their life seems to have already been culled.

***




Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Bring Child Educational Reforms in India by OSA

We often come across debates and discussions over the education system in India. The national news channels also regularly organize chat shows on education system and the necessity of reforms. Though the government of India every year brings reforms in the system of education, but everyone raises questions about the affectivity of those reforms. Making the education free up to a particular class and providing free mid-day meals to children cannot ensure the quality of education. Interest must be generated among the students so that whatever they study, they can use that as a potent weapon in future. The days of �village school master� have gone, who used to beat his students when they fail to complete the home works. In this 21st century, everything is so specified that education system should also be specific so that the students can go for their own interest.

In India, everyone gives importance to bookish knowledge. No one denies the importance of books, but the sphere of knowledge shouldn�t be limited to books only. It should encompass both theoretical and practical knowledge. In this competitive world of ours, we have to know many more things other than those bookish one. Though in some schools in Hyderabad and schools in Ahmedabad and in some other cities, school authorities are adopting new and effective measures and concentrating on practical knowledge to a large extent. But this is not enough. To make each and every student of India competent enough so that they can compete with the world, we have to introduce more practical and creative measures in every school of the country.

Bringing educational reforms in the higher standard, like in graduation or in post-graduation level isn�t enough. If the basic wouldn�t be strong than how a child can flourish in his future? There are list of schools in Hyderabad, Delhi, Kolkata, Bangalore and so on that are adopting modern and technically sound measures to ensure quality education. The classes are no more the boring one; they have turned into smart classes with all latest facilities like digitized classroom and audio-video facilities. The outcome of this sort of effort would be more effective if the government also joints its hands.
It�s an undeniable truth that every child possesses some innate and inborn qualities. So it�s our responsibility to help the child towards realizing those qualities. We worry about what a child will become tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today.

by Hariom